Slate Star Codex - Wikipedia This would be consistent with the idea that more aggressive screening (which is likely to be most aggressive at schools full of white kids because those schools have better resources for such things on average) would cause this effect size to shrink considerably if not vanish. On the first level its obviously because of the genetic abnormalities they have, but its not like we could look at those gene differences and predict that those features would develop in that way. Judith Harris discusses this in one of her books. I dont think there was much correlation at all with years of formal education, and the paths their lives and careers took are almost unimaginable now. This intelligence is shifted towards technical subjects. Ive certainly known highly intelligent people who did not seem to be crazy or disfunctional in any obvious way. If the IQ/autism risk genes are being selected for, we should be seeing more top-level geniuses each generation (Im very skeptical of this) and more autistic children (this half checks out). no ones saying this only affects autistic people identified female at birth. There are almost no exceptions. control children (though see the discussion here) for some debate over how seriously to take this; I am less sure this is accurate than most of the other statistics mentioned here. She hoped to use this theory to explore why some autistics show delayed language acquisition. I remember seeing that article 10 years ago and Ive never followed up, so replication not guaranteed. This can coexist with a loss in the number of people with the highest potential intelligenceif were building sewers and safe water supplies at the same time were convincing our smartest 5% of people to take a vow of celibacy, well get that pattern. Energy/perseverance/drive and other harder to measure factors. ABA research, like autism research in general, suffers from an appalling lack of rigor. Every autism case is caused by some combination of these three factors, and the more it is caused by normal genes, the more intelligence is likely to be preserved (~100% confidence), 4. the genetic load would be due to bad luck in parent mixing (recessive-recessive pairs) and parent age. This seems a possible explanation, if high-IQ parents have children significantly later, I like the tower explanation, but not so much the different types of intelligences: maybe autism is a combination of rare IQ-boosting alleles inherited from parents, together with high general genetic load (which, among other detrimental effects, decrease IQ, negating the IQ-boosting alleles). As I understand it (Im an interested amateur, not an expert, so dont trust this too far! I know plenty of highly intelligent people who nonetheless have very poor impulse control particularly when it comes to libidinous desires! This study of 45,000 Danes finds that genetic risk for autism correlates at about 0.2 with both IQ and educational attainment. Also, if we do get to a bold new future of hyper-intelligent unilaterism, would the hyper-intelligent even want to sign up for it? These are the people that make the Turing test invalid, youd think they were the chatbot. And that finds that only 15% have intellectual disabilities. The optimal value is at 10.0 (for example). completely unfalsifiable, and 2.) It makes sense to me that the microglia that are involved in both the elimination and growth of synapses could end up producing some brains that are less functional and some that are more functional vs. the wild type based on how the extra pruning is done, what parts of the brain its done in, and when its done. FWIW, I know a few bona-fide genius-level people; on the order of Ph.D. Do I say 1.2x that of someone under 30? Or do I say, Not enough data to answer, plausibly extremely high? If we take the Ronemus and Gardner studies seriously, the answer seems to be yes. I favour the Maxander description of the genetic defect in autism, too much brain development can be bad. Getting more education is strongly correlated with later childbearing / siring. But by intelligence mean the ability of a complex system (a brain) to operate effectively; so being smart is much more similar to being able to run really fast or having a good immune system.. * Have a sense of entitlement and require constant, excessive admiration (2) genes that promote autism are being selected for Low IQ people are more likely to end up dead or in jail, and are less likely to be in stable nuclear families. Karpinksi et al. More generally, to relate to those people around you who are also bright. These questions interest me because I know a lot of people who are bright nerdy programmers married to other bright nerdy programmers, and sometimes they ask me if their children are at higher risk for autism. Probably wrong ideas generated from your writing here: We know that core elements of cognition not only do develop early in life, but *have* to develop in life. Lazy googling yields claims around 80% narrow-sense (additive) heritability for height which is comparable to the total heritability of IQ. Im not suggesting this accounts for the high/low intelligence as the sample size was small. Has anyone here actually met a highly intelligent person who is genuinely normal? Isnt autism a bit more sensitive to increased parental age than many other mental disorders? I think, everywhere. The familial genes mentioned above: common genes that increase IQ and that evolution positively selects for. This study of three large birth cohorts finds a correlation between genetic risk for autism and cognitive ability (beta = 0.07). Another, potentially related, possibility is that we are disproportionately likely to diagnose white kids with autism rather than other forms of mental disability. Someone at the 99.0 percentile for intelligence would probably seem quite mediocre by SSC standards. Im not a great student of philosophy, but I dont think most modern philosophers look at the writings of Plato or Descartes or Kant or Hume and think they were intellectual lightweights. About impulse control, there are two strategies being selected for here, one featuring low impulse control(the classic idiocracy strategy) and another (the religious socially conservative strategy) featuring high impulse control: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X18300976. Autistic people being diagnosed with intellectual disabilities before theyre able to to talk and not really being undiagnosed when theyve demonstrated higher levels of ability is very much a thing. A lot of the super smart people I know also seem super interesting either being very funny, uniquely talented, or engaging. AUCHAN RETAIL INTERNATIONAL - Dun & Bradstreet But then the answer to your question becomes so obvious that its hardly worth asking in the first place; there are countless people who are highly intelligent without suffering from any kind of psychological condition or personality disorder or mental/emotional instability. Low-functioning autism has all kinds of genetic linkages to all kinds of different genetic syndromes that cause brain damage, damage that often extends beyond autistic symptoms. n=1, but it was striking to watch my very smart middle kid go from being a near-outcast in his good Catholic school to a guy with lots of friends at his magnet school. Thats probably how he got to that level. Interestingly, other/unspecified PDD and atypical autism also have a significantly higher PRS for neuroticism than childhood autism and Aspergers. I feel like unless your definition of normal includes non-highly intelligent this is just so far from true. ASD core diagnostic symptoms are not uniquely linked and are only very rarely expressed without nondiagnostic symptoms. Maybe even only a small fraction of potential arrangements are just right to produce ever-increasing levels of some capability in the phenotype. One just needs to consider a model where a brain is a complicated object whose organization and function depends on changes in the genetic blueprint in non-monotonic ways, and it is likely that all combinations (attainable via sexual reproduction) of genes that are beneficial alone or in some particular arrangements are not even more beneficial together; some of the potential arrangements are bound to be non-optimal or even catastrophic. If e.g. Highly intelligent people are likely to have different interests, read and talk about different things, than average peopledoes that make them not normal? Some of this effect is because autism is caused both by normal genes and by de novo mutations and environmental insults, and the de novo mutations and environmental insults definitely decrease intelligence. And, being a fairly intelligent person himself, he agreed that it didnt make much sense, but it didnt change that fact that he was able to overpower equally muscular people through sheer force in the ring. I think an important possibility to consider is that some or all of the correlation were observing is simply due to bias in the data were using, rather than any actual relationship between high IQ and autism. And so humans recently had/still are having a massive selection for genes that require lower thresholds for immune responses, and genes that outsource some of the immune de-escalation responsibilities to gut microbes and parasites, etc in order to get a faster jump have proliferated to the point where a lot of these are normal now; this is the hygiene hypothesis or old friends hypothesis and the best outline of I can offer for it is the book An Epidemic of Absence by Moises Velazquez-Manoff. Metaculus is a platform for generating crowd-sourced predictions about the future, especially science and technology. There could be something similar going on with autism. I am not particularly confident in the theory either in its parts or in whole. I spent a lot of time reading about giftedness (having a IQ > 130) in the last few months, specifically educating gifted kids and teenagers, and I found out quite some things about how giftedness can interact with social ability: It turns out that giftedness can be quite a burden for children and teenagers, as not many of their peers can relate to them and vice versa. We both spent a lifetime getting scolded because we were obviously too smart for the dumb stuff we kept doing (grades and the like). Theres a range for this parameter, selection in the past has left most of the population too low, but if you push the parameter up too high things will break. Id say the people in my field are shifted about half a sigma toward introverted, toward socially awkward, and toward tending to become obsessive about their interests/hobbies, but that leaves a lot of people whod seem pretty normal in most ways. r/slatestarcodex - Autism, rationality and intelligence At least part of the story is that there are at least three different causes of autism. He visually learned letter and number orders before turning 2. Get the latest business insights from Dun & Bradstreet. Youre starting with the premise intelligence is incompatible with normality and then reflexively dismissing all evidence to the contrary with theyre not really normal, theyre just pretending. Which is 1.) Hood got his M.D. But in general there will always be a hereditary component to personality characteristics that is probably linked to genes and one will be able to find correlations, but that is a long long way from understanding etiology or validating a single diagnostic label for a broad phenotype. A 120 year old comes into my office and asks what her risk of death next year is. ), in the general population, you will see a very strong correlation between the IQ score someone gets on the two different kind of IQ test, but among autistics, the correlation is much weaker. I am getting a vision of the future. If the extreme male brain hypothesis is true, then those girls have unusually masculinized brains. I think this was also true for some genes supposedly predisposing to ADHD and Schizophrenia. Crespi suggests that autism is marked by an imbalance between P (as the tower) and V + R (as the foundation). Well, in my case it was a single person who did both. So the technically autistic community could well be more intelligent on average than the general population, with the people who are actually labeled autistic being a particularly low-functioning subset of that population. Overall I would be surprised if this were the real explanation for the autism-and-intelligence paradox, but it gets an A for effort. Wheat: Much More Than You Wanted To Know I guess it depends on how you define weirdness; I define it as having interests, beliefs, or though processes that are significantly different than most people I dont think Ive encountered any extremely intelligent people for whom none of the above are the case. Slate Star Codex Suggestion - The Autism Neurodiversity Debate Your argument also seems tautological to an extent; if youre defining normal as someone who thinks like a normal person, thats basically the equivalent of describing an object as being shaped like itself. Its also a chapter of The 10,000 Year Explosion. Fall short of that threshold and you have a pile of severely broken processes. however, ASD without these two confounders shows no correlation with IQ. Within our filter bubble, people have similar levels of status, so they can be smart but not charismatic or charismatic but not smart. My wife also has a university degree, her father was an engineer and his 3 siblings had careers in operations research, research scientist, school principal. I am not saying they have the full disorder (and no its not a partisan snipe, except to the extent that being very skeptical of the US bureaucratic class is partisan). If you get much past that, all intelligible sound will cease and be replaced by a terrible noise that wasnt exhibited _anywhere_ prior in the range of the knob. You don't have to be a diagnosed autist to be like that. It is known that gifted kids can be misdiagnosed as autism, ADHD or both, but many psychologist never bother doing IQ tests, or do them, but then ignore the results. AISafety.com hosts a Skype reading group Wednesdays at 19:45 UTC, reading new and old articles on different aspects of AI Safety. But extra cash helps pay for contest prizes, meetup expenses, and me spending extra time blogging instead of working. My current boss. Its 100% true. Altruisto is a browser extension so that when you shop online, a portion of the money you pay goes to effective charities (no extra cost to you). As a result, we could have similar imbalances. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6013750/, Increasing repeat length was associated with higher GAI scores up until roughly 4041 repeats. Theres a lot of work left to do to sort out what being autistic actually means. One solution is to view your family rather than your schoolmates as your peer group. Auditory learning is therefore the only accessible means for learning prior to the bridging of other brain functions. Another study showing how autistic people have higher prevalence in inpatient psychiatric units. (Always Sunny parodied this phenomenon with Mac, who only works out his glamour muscles.). Our ages when our son (1st child) was born were 27 (me) and 26 (my wife), and for our daughter (3rd child) we were 31 and 30. That figure seems very low to me, though it depends what exactly you define as incredibly smart and incredibly charismatic. If we take incredibly to be synonymous with top percentile, there would be 75 million people in the world who are incredibly intelligent. Several studies have shown a genetic link between autism and intelligence; genes that contribute to autism risk also contribute to high IQ. n=1 description of autism and speculation on etiology. This makes a very strong auditory learner. This is why, as a freshman at 125 lbs, I could beat seniors at 160, 171, 189, and 215 lbs on our team, despite all of them crushing me at the bench press. While their children are clearly at higher risk for autistic traits, I think they want to know whether they have higher risk for the most severe forms of the syndrome, including intellectual disability and poor functioning. Sample: literally the whole of scotland. The genes and developmental stuff is one part, an enriching environment in childhood is another, and the physical requirements (adequate nutrition and good health and few toxins present during critical parts of brain development in childhood, continued good health in adulthood). I am able to emulate being normal very well at work, but horrible in casual settings. Im not sure what you mean by normal. I also need alternative means to handle a wide variety of learning and perceptual tasks. I would hypothesize based on this that autistic people usually have parents who are very good at exactly those areas that they have trouble in. List 1 Avoids eye contact Doesn't smile Doesn't reach out to be picked up Rejects your efforts to calm, soothe, and connect Doesn't seem to notice or care when you leave them alone Cries inconsolably Doesn't coo or make sounds Autism prevalence increase, Deisseroth's "Projections", systems Genes are not something where you can say, this is good, more of it will be better. Normality is just too vague to be quantifiable. For example, they are not extremely aggressive, but tend to be gentle individuals. This post is missing a discussion of the changing meaning of autism. Maybe this is a tower collapse event. I also have more ability to perceive what processes I am running. https://slatestarcodex.com/2019/05/07/5-httlpr-a-pointed-review/, https://sci-hub.tw/10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.18070881, Arizone State University Autism symptoms reduced nearly 50% two years after fecal transplant, The Economist More evidence that autism is linked to gut bacteria, Maybe Your Zoloft Stopped Working Because A Liver Fluke Tried To Turn Your Nth-Great-Grandmother Into A Zombie, https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40489-016-0085-x.pdf, http://cepuk.org/unrecognised-facts/diagnostic-system-lacks-validity/, https://medicine.uiowa.edu/psychiatry/content/ui-research-suggests-huntingtons-disease-gene-also-vital-human-development-and-intelligence, https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2749054, https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/8/e029040.full. Well, much debate here gets into the distinction between people with high functioning autism and Aspergers, due to a muddling at that end of the scale. Based on those two correlations, I would be very surprised if it didnt add up to a correlation between predisposition for autism and children later in life. The fact that nobody has noticed and studied an effect in a subgroup is evidence that the subgroup does not have a large effect. No ICU or anything that severe, but still something that differentiates her from the other children. Also, the Gardner paper has analyzed autistic patients fathers by subtype of intelligence, and there is a nonsignificant but pretty suggestive tendency for them to have higher-than-normal verbal intelligence; certainly no signs of high verbal intelligence preventing autism. About 13% of autistic children (in this sample from whatever social stratum they took their sample from) have fathers who are engineers, compared to only 5% of a group of (presumably well-matched?) https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2018-03-06/humanity-keeps-getting-smarter. I imagine the effort you put into fitting in goes down as you get older. This is Crespi 2016, Autism As A Disorder Of High Intelligence. I am known as a word smith (and its an important part of my career, but Im not in journalism). Say you are a bright nerdy tech-aligned person who is attracted to other bright nerdy tech-aligned people; you have a medium preference for eventually having kids but you really dont want an autistic child. So, one can see how this would obviously lead to an increase in autoimmunity, but in one of the later chapters AEoA, Velazquez-Manoff also shows how autism (a least a lot of the time) is an inflammatory condition: for instance, autopsies uniformly showing neural inflammation, people with ASDs are more likely to develop autoimmune diseases than the general population and are more likely to have family members with autoimmune diseases, and for a few subjects treatment with immune-modulating intestinal worms providing some symptom relief even. . Beeminder's an evidence-based willpower augmention tool that collects quantifiable data about your life, then helps you organize it into commitment mechanisms so you can keep resolutions. Dr. Laura Baur is a psychiatrist with interests in literature review, reproductive psychiatry, and relational psychotherapy; see her website for more. I never liked that. You mentioned height, which I think is a good example too we have studies (possibly not good ones) showing that taller people have better outcomes, get treated nicer, are more attractive but people who get too tall have bad medical problems, shorter life expectancy. There are plenty of incredibly smart and simultaneously charismatic people out there. Why would you doubt it if you dont have the data? Check out their free anti-anxiety guide here. But African slaves survived. Note that billionaires in America are still vulnerable to (using a topical example) wealth taxes, and abroad billionaires in Russia / China must play the cuddle up to Putin / Xi or die / get put in a camp game. Fedex Clearance Delay Matraville, Environmental Conditions In Badminton, Articles S
">